Page 1 of 1

Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:10 pm
by RogerFraser
This tender makes one wonder what kind of things go on in Sanparks boardrooms these days that they need anti spying and security for their executives

https://www.sanparks.org/groups/tenders ... nkloof.php

Re: Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:49 pm
by Lisbeth
Maybe they only want an anti-hacker software O**

Re: Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:58 pm
by RogerFraser
Lisbeth wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:49 pm Maybe they only want an anti-hacker software O**
:no: its more than something so simple ....

 Provide technical expert, detection, and isolation of eavesdropping devices
 Identify any possible technical surveillance penetrations, technical surveillance hazards, and physical security weaknesses.
 Put systems in place to prevent illegal spies, stop illegal espionage and plug leaks.
 Assess and remove bug sweeps, wiretap detection, and communications engineering services,
 Sweep the current office block during the time that no staff is available in the building as their presence can compromise this sensitive operation
 Use the latest technology in the industry and equipment which is highly rated in the industry.
 Implement the above in 7 Executive Boardrooms, 2 small boardrooms and 2 training rooms
 Provide a report or certification with regards to what has been implemented
 Information remains the property of SANParks
 Report all suspicious information picked up to the authorities as outlined in the contract
 Identify spy works as many as possible and guide on proactive measures
 Provide a detailed report of the outcome of the technical surveillance at the end of the service
 Provide a report or certification with regards to what has been implemented
 Information remains the property of SANParks

Re: Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:04 pm
by Lisbeth
Looks like it O-/

Re: Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:36 am
by Flutterby
:-?

Re: Spy vs Sanparks

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:44 am
by Richprins
0*\

Probably some SOE tender going around... :O^