Page 91 of 295

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:40 pm
by nan
beautiful ^Q^

we call them "phasme"... if it's can help :-?

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:00 pm
by Toko
\O that's the order of all stick insects

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:12 pm
by nan
Toko wrote: \O that's the order of all stick insects
:o0ps:

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:16 pm
by ExFmem
Genus: Bactrododema Stål, 1858
= Palophus Westwood, 1859: 90
= Ischnopoda Grandidier, 1869: 176 (Homonym of Ischnopoda Stephens, 1835)
-O- -O-


Maransis brownii is endemic to the Northern Cape, but doesn't really look like mine. :-(

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:51 pm
by ExFmem
Do you have a photo of B. reyi? I'm getting confused by the length of the antennae on the pics I find, as "mine" has rather short ones -O-

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:58 pm
by Toko
Only pics from google found

The antennae are short in yours, that's right -O-

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:08 pm
by BluTuna

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:09 pm
by ExFmem
http://images.google.com/images?q=Bactr ... eyi&sout=1

=O: :o0ps: :o0ps: I think I was looking at the outstretched fore legs 0- 0-
Okay, shall we go with B. reyi ^Q^ ^Q^

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:19 pm
by Toko
If you are convinced, go for it O:V

Re: Insect or Invertebrates Identification

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:12 am
by Toko
Toko wrote:
ExFmem wrote:
BluTuna wrote:Hi everyone 0/*

Here are some more grasshopper/crickets to be ID'd for the insect book. All taken in my garden in Randburg.

4. Two of the same insect, note the extremely long antennae.
Image
Image
This is a baby (nymph?) katydid. Can anyone take it further?
Conocephalus caudalis -O- -O- -O-

females are wingless

Better idea :-? : Subfamily Phaneropterinae 0', Phaneroptera nymph

Ph. nana for comparison looks like this http://www.flickriver.com/photos/fturmo ... 058041252/

and here:
http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http ... CFsQrQMwAQ

I'd suggest we make it a Phaneropterini nymph, and a possibly Phaneroptera -O-

Objections? 0'