SANDF soldier’s poaching trial to continue next year
The state had at least established a prima facie case against the accused
December 8, 2015
MBOMBELA – South African National Defence Force (SANDF) soldier, Mr Boet Mashego, and his co-accused Mr Micheal Sithole, tried in vain to prove that the state’s case against them was nothing more than a fabrication in the Nelspruit Regional Court on Wednesday.
The magistrate, Mr André Geldenhuys, decided that the state had at least established a prima facie case against the accused and that they would therefore have to defend themselves against poaching allegations on January 21.
Mashego and Sithole allegedly poached three rhinos and stole their six horns on three different occasions. According to the charge sheet, this happened on June 10, June 22 and September 30, 2010.
Rangers had previously testified encountering the two men at 03:45 in the Stolsnek area of the Kruger National Park (KNP). Mashego allegedly pointed his firearm in the rangers’ direction and a shoot-out ensued during which he was wounded.
Mashego and Sithole’s attorney, Mr Daniel Mabunda, has said that his clients will testify that they were not poaching any rhinos. He added that they were innocent and that they were merely walking around in the area looking for herbs and cattle.
They will finally be offered the opportunity to prove this next year.
On October 1, Lowvelder reported:
MBOMBELA – On Monday the state closed its case against former SANDF soldier Mr Boet Mashego, and Mr Micheal Sithole. They applied for the charges against them to be dropped.
Mashego and Sithole stand accused of poaching three rhinos and stealing their six horns on three different occasions. These crimes were allegedly committed in the Kruger National Park on June 10, June 22 and September 30, 2010.
It was testified that at 03:45 on the last date, game rangers encountered the two men in the Stolsnek area. They were positioned close to the park’s fence. When Mashego pointed his firearm in the rangers’ direction, a shoot-out ensued and he was wounded. According to testimony led during the trial, the two were arrested with rhino horns in their possession.
When the state closed its case, defence attorney, Mr Daniel Mabunda applied for his client, Sithole, to be discharged. Mabunda alleged that the state’s case against his client was fabricated. He added that they were innocent and that they were merely walking around in the area looking for herbs and cattle.
Senior state advocate, Ms Isabet Erwee’s counter argument held that the state had called numerous witnesses throughout the trial. She added that sufficient evidence had thus far been adduced against the accused to warrant the continuation of their trial.
The magistrate, Mr André Geldenhuys, postponed the case to October 15, when he would confirm whether the case against them would continue.
http://lowvelder.co.za/295192/sandf-sol ... -its-case/
Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596