Oh my goodness,..
Mel wrote:There seems to be a misunderstanding on your side, H.e.
Mel, no misunderstanding at all from my side in fact as I was typing
a sense of consideration filled my mind,,

with regard to offensive,
I have no clue what Lis is on about,..in fact both Lis and Nan are quite
correct in their thinking!!! But of course Sanparks are after the foreign
dollars and dollars only, to heck with local ethics and all local social
balderdash they portray!!
There are many enough venues that cater for creepy crawly sensitive
visitors to the park. This hotel venture, I beg to iterate, was not based
on this kind of mind swing as a outset.
My statement with regard to,...
H. erectus wrote:Another cheapskate religion in the making Liz????
Dear Lis, my fellow lobbyists will support me here in the sense that
I expressed, on behalf of the greater public that visit this park, that
Kruger withholds some kind of grip over the moral being. It is a sacred
place to many for it manages to transform ones very active mind, into
a very peaceful contentedness.
To my way of thinking, Sanparks in their mission strategy 2022 are destroying
a very special situation, where all can enjoy and come to one, fulfilling their
expectations. I do not belong to any religion yet respect and grant other this
very special situation.
Commercialization, probably the worst fertilizer that can be used that would
make a park yield more dollars. Hence my statement,....
H. erectus wrote:Another cheapskate religion in the making Liz????
Folks offense???,...wasn't meant that way,...
