Hunting in Botswana

Information and Discussions on Hunting
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Hunting in Botswana

Post by Lisbeth »

:-?

It is not easy to decide what is wrong and what is right, if you do not have objective information. Certainly it is impossible to trust whatever is written, because it all depends on the authors' convictions. If you then have to count with bribing and what do I know, it gets impossible.

The hunters might spend more, but the tourists with a camera are a much bigger number. I suppose that they want both.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 44150
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Hunting in Botswana

Post by Flutterby »

True Lis, and hunting is such a difficult topic. I don't like it but I can understand the need for it. :-? -O-


User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

“Arguments for lifting the ban or not” (Botswana)

Post by Lisbeth »

Image

BY CORRESPONDENT - 6 JULY 2018 - MMEGI

Image
Dr Mike Chase collaring an elephant in the CKGR PIC: THALEFANG CHARLES

On June 21, 2018, some of Botswana’s Members of Parliament adopted a motion to lift the elephant hunting ban.

They cited the following reasons for this decision:

1. An increase in Botswana’s elephant population

2. Human Elephant Conflict

3. Less benefits from tourism

To effectively minimise human-elephant conflict (HEC), it is necessary to understand a suite of issues, including: elephant behaviour, biology and population dynamics; human attitudes and reactions; and the efficacy of management strategies. I am a Motswana elephant biologist, with 20 years’ experience studying elephant ecology throughout Africa, and in 2001 founded an NGO called Elephants Without Borders. I lean on my experience and published data by our research team in peer-reviewed journals to provide objective information. Issues of elephant management are complex and controversial, involving not only data and expert opinion, but also values, ethics and emotions of stakeholders all over the world.

1. Contrary to popular belief Botswana’s elephant population is not increasing. Many people assume that an increase in the number of conflicts between elephants and humans is automatically due to an increasing elephant population.

Increases in human-elephant conflict outside the ‘traditional elephant range’ are more closely associated with increases in human population densities than elephant population growth.

The last two elephant surveys (2010 and 2014) by the Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP) and Elephants Without Borders (EWB) revealed an estimate of 130, 000 elephants in northern Botswana. Looking at 20 years of data, our demographic modelling, shows the elephant population has been stable for the past 15 years.

These results lend further support to the notion that the increase in complaints and human-elephant conflict over the last decade are due to elephant redistribution across the landscape coupled with an increase in human population densities and not an increase in the number of elephants.

Our aerial surveys and satellite movement studies reveal elephants have expanded their range by 35%. Between 2001 and 2017. Elephants are repopulating historical ranges in Botswana, occurring in areas where they have not been seen in the past 50 years, regions which are much more heavily populated and developed. People incorrectly conclude that this range expansion is a result of increased numbers.

Against a backdrop of poaching throughout Africa which has reduced elephants by 30%, or 144, 000 animals over a period of seven years, the recovery of Botswana’s elephant population must be heralded for what it is; one of the greatest conservation success stories in Africa. This is something we should all be proud of, and our conservation legacy is emblematic of the values Batswana strive for; peace, coexistence and Botho.

2. Members of Parliament are on record stating that resuming hunting will reduce human-elephant conflict implying hunting is the silver bullet to addressing the problem.

As a response, let me start by looking at the reasons elephants have expanded their ranges in Botswana.

i. Density dependent dispersal – search for food,

ii. Failure of the Kavango-Zambezi TFCA. Poaching and habitat constriction in southern Angola, Zambia and along Botswana’s borders have restricted elephants to remain in the safety of Botswana,

iii. Water availability in the form of artificial water and recent flooding events in previously dry rivers have enticed elephant to move further south, and

iv. Vet fences are effective barriers to elephant movements, but many of them have not been maintained and long stretches are broken giving elephants access to new areas.

In all likelihood, the reintroduction of trophy hunting will have no impact on any of these factors as they are unrelated to the ban on trophy hunting in 2014.

In addition, there is no evidence to support claims that within the traditional elephant range human- elephant conflict has increased. At a national level, complaints have increased largely because elephants now occur over a much larger area. DWNP problem animal control statistics reveal that in the Chobe Enclave for example, human-elephant conflict incidents now are the same as when hunting was permitted.

Hunting occurs in the dry season and targets large bulls, while elephant crop raiding coincides with the rainy season and the perpetrators tend to be young bulls or family herds.

The variation in the timing, space use, age and sex of problem elephants suggest hunting will have a limited effect on solving human-elephant conflict.

This does not mean that EWB or Government does not take the HEC incidents that do occur seriously.

They do, and all concerns raised by communities are absolutely valid. However, we have a new set of factors as outlined above, and DWNP, as the agent tasked with responding to HEC incidents, now need to respond accordingly and effectively to the anguish of communities.

The research EWB has done suggests that reducing HEC will require a range of interventions, including Government programmes, policies and incentives as an essential element of successful coexistence initiatives.

Amongst these, education and awareness around elephants, recognising elephant migration corridors, rapid response to conflicts, the allocation of agricultural plots in appropriate areas and the further promotion of localised ecotourism businesses can all play significant roles.

We don’t need more management plans and meetings! In the end, it is important to recognise that humans are a root cause of many of these issues, and that focusing on elephants as a threat or as an economic nuisance is largely counterproductive. To solve these problems, the central focus needs to be human behaviour.

3. The assertions that elephant hunting is a mainstay and that without it, communities get no benefit at all lacks evidential support. In fact, the impressive growth of the wider ecotourism industry over the last 20 years indicates the opposite.

Botswana is globally known as the ‘land of the giants’ a safe refuge for the world’s largest elephant population.

This has become a feature attraction to the thriving photographic ecotourism industry, the most significant employer and economic sector in northern Botswana.

In addition, without trophy hunting, Botswana has a comparative advantage as a safari destination over all its regional neighbours.

Tourists, who are increasingly seeking destinations offering responsible and ethical activities, can choose Botswana over countries offering hunting.

Some argue that a reintroduction of elephant hunting will cause Botswana’s brand irreparable harm overseas and a drop-off in tourism arrivals and thus in-turn either job losses or no growth in job creation.

A new emphasis in conservation in Botswana is needed, where we try to manage human-elephant conflict, and find ways in which preserving wildlife that is otherwise dangerous can benefit rural communities.

We must now harness our global position as a leader in wildlife tourism and ensure that our national elephant herd improves the quality of life for all Batswana.

DR MIKE CHASE

*Botswana born, Mike Chase, (PhD), has been studying the ecology of elephants since 2001 and was the first Motswana to receive his doctorate specifically in elephant ecology. Chase is the founder of Elephants without Borders and in 2015 was bestowed the Presidential Order of Meritorious Service Award by former President, Seretse Khama Ian Khama for exceptional service to the country and conservation efforts

Read original article: http://www.mmegi.bw/index.php?aid=76545 ... 18/july/06


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75963
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: “Arguments for lifting the ban are unsound” (Botswana)

Post by Richprins »

The endless debate...


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: “Arguments for lifting the ban are unsound” (Botswana)

Post by Lisbeth »

Botswana hunting proposal could put its tourism industry at risk

2019-03-14 10:30 - Janine Avery

Botswana’s proposals to lift its hunting ban and to introduce elephant culling has fuelled political posturing, denials, misinformation, and lobbying from pro-hunting and culling groups.

But what does the group that has the most to lose, the photo tourism industry, have to say on the matter?

The hunting ban

The release of the report was timed as elections in Botswana loom and clearly aimed at garnering the rural vote, has stirred a heated debate in the media. The recommendations are to grow the safari hunting industry, construct wildlife fences, close wildlife migratory routes, introduce elephant culling and build elephant meat canning facilities.

The ban left some communities, who were dependant on hunting bereft of income, fuelling discontent. The recommendations come after meetings with various stakeholders including these affected communities, however, they were presented with only minimal consultation with the tourism industry or communities benefiting from tourism.

Today 18% of the country’s land is dedicated to national parks and 23% to wildlife management areas. “Botswana has created an enviable reputation consistently over the decades as a leading tourism destination,” says Beks Ndlovu of African Bush Camps, “These policies (nonhunting) have created an iconic safari destination and an industry that is the second largest in Botswana, bringing jobs and prosperity to many of Botswana’s citizens.”

In 2017, travel and tourism contributed to 11.5% of the country’s GDP, while supporting 7.6% of Botswana’s total employment (some 76 000 jobs) with both figures on the rise. So a large number of people have a vested interested in protecting the country’s wildlife.

“On nearly all measures: employment opportunities, skills development, income earned, visitor numbers, knock-on benefits to the wider economy as well as ecological considerations, for example, well-managed photo-tourism is the best land-use option to manage the protected areas of Botswana,” says Ian Michler, Director of Invent Africa Safaris.

This highly productive industry is now under threat since many visitors choose Botswana as their safari destination specifically because of its firm anti-hunting stance. Some consumers and sections of the media are already calling on a boycott of travel to Botswana.

Tourism Industry Response

The photo tourism industry remains positive that their voices will be heard: “&Beyond remains confident that Botswana remains a safe haven for wildlife,” says Valeri Mouton of &Beyond.

It’s a view that has been echoed by Colin Bell, a co-founder of photo tourism safari company, Natural Selection.

“My view is that there is no need to reach for the blood pressure pills at this early stage in the consultation process – and that ultimately good sense will prevail.”

Wilderness Safaris, Botswana’s leading ecotourism operator, stated that they will engage with the minister in a process of problem solving, with one of their aims being to increase citizen participation in the tourism industry and further increase its contribution to the national economy.

Ndlovu agrees. “The current recommendations to the President are the views of some rural community members. The tourism industry is next in line for consultation and no doubt our views will be fully heard.

Dereck Joubert, CEO of the Great Plains Conservation is one voice that is less confident. Calling the proposal, ‘Botswana’s Blood Law’, Joubert has started a petition to oppose these recommendations. “I have seen enough dead elephants from the bad guys. I don’t need to see a thousand more piles from our own government,” says Joubert.

What they stand to lose

While many have applauded the government for embracing a consultative process, lacking in previous years, others say the proposal goes against everything the country stands for. Known as a safe-haven for elephants, and home to almost a third of Africa’s elephants, they feel that the country has a responsibility to protect these creatures.

“Bringing back trophy hunting will not stop poaching, nor will introducing a legal trade of ivory and other elephant products, which flies in the face of Botswana’s commitments as a founding member of the Elephant Protection Initiative,” says the Environmental Investigation Agency.

Howard Jones, CEO of Born Free, agrees, saying that this is precisely the wrong way to approach co-existence and that, “the government of Botswana has decided that the vice of personal profit can outweigh common sense.”

It’s a statement that is echoed in the petition by Joubert: “The hunts, and proposed culls, would not be for any conservation reason at all, but only to satisfy greed.”

Michler sums it up: “The current government is correct in wanting to improve on a number of community, human-animal conflict and communication challenges neglected by the previous government, but to take regressive steps rather than building on a sound ecotourism record is not smart.”

(Source: Conservation Action Trust)


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: “Arguments for lifting the ban are unsound” (Botswana)

Post by Lisbeth »

Oppose Botswana's suggested 'Blood Laws' of elephant culls and trophy hunts

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/community_p ... NKQib%2Ben


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Hunting in Botswana

Post by Lisbeth »

Botswana elephant hunting: Chaos and disillusionment as citizen licenses are raffled
Posted on October 3, 2019 by News Desk in the NEWS DESK post series.

Image
© Joaquín Rivero

NEWS DESK POST with information sourced from Mmegi Online
Recently the Botswana government declared the opening of the hunting season for 2019, having lifted the ban on elephant hunting earlier this year.

According to the Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), a reserve quota of 86 elephant hunting licences has been set aside for Botswana citizens (at the price of BWP 8,000 each), while an open quota of 72 licences for next year’s hunting season (expected to begin in April) is allowed for non-citizens. The licenses will be awarded to non-citizens through a bidding process, while a nationwide raffle system will award licences to citizens.

Recently one of these raffles was held in Maun (for hunting concession NG9, with a total of 111 animals to be hunted, including eight elephants), where almost 6,000 people turned up for the chance to win one of the eight elephant licences reserved for the area.

According to Boniface Keakabetse who was at the raffle in Maun, numbers showed that at least 30,076 people registered to participate in the raffles across the various species on offer, which include impala, baboon, ostrich, warthog, steenbok, duiker, wildebeest and kudu. In Maun, at least 5,990 registered for a chance to receive an elephant hunting licence.

Image
Officials at the hunting raffle in Maun © Boniface Keakabetse/Mmegi Online

However, once the raffle was concluded, those few who had received an elephant hunting licence were left frustrated after the terms and conditions were subsequently announced: The licenses to hunt elephants cannot be transferred to anyone else, including non-citizens. They are expected to pay the hunting licence of P8,000 (US$720). They cannot sell or export the tusks. The hunt has to be supervised by a professional hunter and professional guide, as well as a tracking team and DWNP personnel.

These conditions will be enforced strictly, with penalties and censures in place for transgressors

The strict T&Cs did not go down well with the winners, particularly that they cannot transfer the elephant hunting licences.

Bogosi Thutoetsile (53) from the Shashe ward in Maun was one of the few picked for an elephant licence.

“When the government announced the citizen hunting quota, I immediately applied. I am happy that I have ‘won’ an elephant,” Thutoetsile said. “I had hoped I would be able to sell the tusks. I don’t eat elephant meat so I do not know what I am going to do with it. I think as citizens we should be allowed to sell the licences to commercial hunters or export the tusks to improve our livelihoods.”

The cost of the licence is another concern for Thutoetsile. “That money is too much when you consider that I cannot sell the tusks. There are other costs I will incur like transportation and accommodation costs to NG9 to hunt the elephant.”

The government appears aware of the concerns expressed by citizens and says that the hunting season will start off “slowly and cautiously”, with the first session of the season (which runs between September and November) used to test the hunting guidelines and gauge the demand amongst its citizens for hunting.

About News Desk
A collection of current affairs articles and press releases from third party sources.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: “Arguments for lifting the ban are unsound” (Botswana)

Post by Lisbeth »

Botswana defends elephant hunts

Oct 15 2019 21:03 Mike Cohen | Bloomberg News

Botswana’s decision to reintroduce elephant hunting was necessary to protect its people and environment and hasn’t adversely affected the $2bn tourism industry, according to Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Joy Kenewendo.

Botswana has the world’s biggest elephant population, with about 130 000 of the animals. Increasing incidents of elephants destroying crops and trampling villagers to death were cited by President Mokgweetsi Masisi as ther reason he lifted a hunting ban on wildlife in May.

The decision, condemned by conservation groups, has become a key political issue as Masisi seeks to win re-election next week. The move to keep the elephant population under control could help shore up his support in rural communities but it also widened a rift with his predecessor, Ian Khama, who has since formed a rival party.

The government’s main motivation was to address a human-wildlife conflict that had reached “epidemic proportions,” Kenewendo said in a phone interview from Gaborone, the capital.

“What is important to us is to protect the environment, it’s to protect our people and ensure that there is a balance in the ecosystem,” she said. “When we talk to people on a personal level and when they come here, they get to really understand what we are talking about. As a result we haven’t really seen a big change in our tourism.”

As many as 50 Batswana, the term for people from the country, were killed by elephants since 2014 and hundreds of reports of property damage have been filed.

Trophy hunts

Tourism, mainly in the form of photographic safaris around the southern African nation’s Okavango and Chobe regions, accounts for a fifth of Botswana’s economy. The government intends allowing 158 elephants to be killed in trophy hunts over the next year.

One-third of the territory in Botswana, the world’s second-biggest diamond producer, has been dedicated to conservation but that’s still not enough to accommodate its growing number of elephants, according to Kenewendo.

“Conservation is part of the tradition,” she said. “The animals are there now because the people have allowed them to be there, they have shared the land, they have shared the resources, and it wouldn’t change overnight. It’s just really trying to find our balance.”


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Hunting in Botswana

Post by Lisbeth »

Trophy hunting of elephants in Botswana has no place in conservation: A reply to Tony Weaver

BY ROSS HARVEY - 22 OCTOBER 2019 - NETWERK24

Tony Weaver has defended Botswana’s decision to reintroduce trophy hunting. Personally, he doesn’t ‘quite understand what motivates hunters’, but intellectually, he fully supports it ‘as a critical conservation tool for preserving Africa’s wildlife and wild places.’ This is despite the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) having now declared that the practice is incompatible with ‘sustainable use’ and the quest for a just and sustainable world. Weaver offers little scientific evidence to support his views, possibly because most of the science around hunting says that it can only work ‘provided it is well governed’. In other words, only in Utopia.

Weaver begins by labelling critics of the decision as non-Motswana. Many tourism operators and NGOs working in Botswana do not support elephant trophy hunting, however along with their Namibian and Tanzanian counterparts, they are reluctant to say so in public for fear of losing their research permits.

A common justification for hunting is that Botswana has too many elephants that have exceeded the landscape’s ‘carrying capacity’. A number of globally-acclaimed elephant experts have written a compelling letter to President Masisi that refutes this claim. A recent scientific journal article similarly debunks this argument.

Weaver’s contention that “the ban has had a devastating effect on rural communities ‘living daily with human-wildlife conflict’ and resulted in a collapse ‘in some more than 40% of micro-GDP’ is not an argument in favour of reintroducing trophy hunting. The way in which the moratorium was imposed was clearly problematic and created resentment among some rural communities. Reduction in income is not an automatic argument in favour of reintroducing hunting, especially if the economic opportunity costs and genetic loss of big tuskers) of such a decision have been ignored.

Namibia’s conservation model is lauded as the inspiration for Masisi’s decision. Weaver quotes Phomamba Shifeta, Namibia’s Minister of Environment and Tourism. Shifeta claims that hunting accounts for the success of communal conservancies as it provides livelihoods for communities. But does it?

While it may be true that hunting provides livelihoods for some local communities, it is not clear that hunting will serve those communities best in the long run. Shifeta himself admits to corruption, ‘blatant theft and self-enrichment’, though he insists these are isolated cases. Presumably he was referring to the hunting of Voortrekker, one of the last remaining bulls of the unique southern desert elephants. The government issued the permit for Voortrekker to be shot as a ‘problem animal’, though it turned out he clearly wasn’t. Weaver’s analysis of that situation was that the problem was that the elephant had a name, which gave ammo to ‘animal rightists.’ But a number of communities protested against the permit. Unfortunately for Shifeta, these are hardly isolated incidents. The global hunting fraternity has struggled to crowd out the bad apples.

Invariably, even the best scientific defenses of hunting attach heavy caveats that it can only work if well governed. But the problem with the caveats is that they can’t be realised. It is fundamentally incentive-incompatible with the very nature of trophy hunting in open systems.

Originally published in Afrikaans: https://www.netwerk24.com/Stemme/Mening ... n-20191021


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67387
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Hunting in Botswana

Post by Lisbeth »

BOTSWANA TO START ISSUING TROPHY HUNTING LICENCES IN DECEMBER

President Mokgweetsi Masisi's government in May removed the moratorium, just a year after he succeeded Ian Khama who had introduced a blanket hunting ban in 2014.

Image
FILE: A young elephant grazes in the Chobe River in Botswana's Chobe National Park. Picture: AFP

GABORONE - Botswana's president announced on Monday the government will by December start issuing trophy hunting licences after it controversially scrapped a five-year ban on the practice, and angered international conservationists.

President Mokgweetsi Masisi's government in May removed the moratorium, just a year after he succeeded Ian Khama, an avid environmentalist, who had introduced a blanket hunting ban in 2014 to reverse a decline in the population of wild animals.

The removal of the ban was praised by local communities but derided by conservationists and ignited political friction between the Khama and Masisi.

Botswana fended off criticism of its decision, saying the move would not threaten the elephant population.

"Quotas will be issued by December 2019 to allow for marketing ahead of the 2020 hunting season," Masisi said in his first state of the nation address since he was elected into office following last month's polls.

"It is expected that hunting will contribute significantly to reducing the human-wildlife conflict by creating viable and balanced populations," he said.

Masisi said his government is developing guidelines "to provide direction on hunting," he added.

The commercial hunting season opens in April.

In an interview with AFP in October, Masisi defended his decision to remove the ban on hunting saying Botswana has a capacity to carry "50,000 (elephants) and we have in excess of 130,000".

In an interview with AFP last month, Khama called Masisi's decision to lift the ban as "short-sighted".

"He thought he would be popular," said Khama.

"When you have a resource, even if it's diamonds, the more you have the better and that's the approach we took with wildlife, that here is a resource that we have, so let us grow the resource, make it viable," added Khama.

Khama said tourist numbers had declined 15% since the ban was lifted.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Post Reply

Return to “Hunting”