Page 1 of 2
SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:25 pm
by Richprins
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:16 pm
by Richprins
Orpen Hotel also on the cards, as predicted. The only one missing really is Punda Maria Hotel?
And lots of tenders for other National Parks, not my baby!
We at least got Kruger CEO to agree to stakeholder meetings in the major SA metropoles regarding the 10 year development plan starting this year. A few meetings have already happened around Kruger's borders with local communities.
These huge potential developments should be part of the public participation in the longer term, not "rubber stamped" before the big meetings!
Not playing fair at all!
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:12 pm
by Lisbeth
Our national parks are not only about the conservation of fauna and flora. They are also important catalysts
for economic development. As government, we will continue to look for partners in the establishment of
responsible new products for sustainable development and tourism growth while at the same time, and
more importantly, ensuring that our fauna and flora in our national parks are conserved.
In Italian we say " You can not have the barrel full and your wife drunk"
Certain things just don't go together
Who is the CEO of Sanparks:
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:16 pm
by Lisbeth
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:58 pm
by nan
... or to forget
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:21 am
by All-Nature
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 12:00 pm
by Mel
I had a look at the link last night already and must say when you look at the amount of planned developments all over the parks in total and individually for specific parks,
you really wonder if they can be a success at all. It all seems way too much for a wildlife reserve to offer the activities suggested in that brochure. Maybe I'm totally yesteryear
but I don't see people enjoying game viewing and activities like spa treatments, quad biking, hot air ballooning and all the others that were listed at the same time. Having just
returned from a holiday with first-timers who do enjoy their pool time and their reading time as well, I'm certain that they rather leave the park if they were bored with
watching the animals and do something altogether than staying in Kruger and making use of planned facilities. My example are people who wouldn't mind staying in a hotel or
lodge in Kruger because they don't know any different. But they would not like idea of being pampered, so we're back to self-catering. And there lies the problem, in my opinion:
The offered accommodation in Kruger is worn and not particularly inviting, but extremely expensive - especially compared to other places all over SA. Hence there is no reason to stay
for a two week holiday and occupy yourself in the activity hubs in case you're done with the quiet time. You just pack up and leave and do your stuff elsewhere while staying in cheaper
yet nicer chalets / doubles / etc.
Obviously, the offer to apply for those activity outlets is happening. But I really wonder if there are enough qualified experts to fill all the voids that (only) the SanParks Management
seems to see for their parks.
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:43 pm
by Richprins
With big developments it is people from outside come with proposals, I think? And then the tender fun starts...
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:00 pm
by Mel
Ja, I know. But they come with proposals for the people staying inside. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense for SP to get involved.
Re: SANParks Tourism Investment Summit 2017
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:17 pm
by Lisbeth
The important thing is to make money and when it comes to that, anything goes