However, there is a definite need to cater to the guests who are looking at optimising the visit to a National Park
Who determined that need, I wonder...
Considering the fact that those WAHs are to bring revenue it means they must cost money. So, people will have to pay for being educated.
I don't see how this is going to happened with the majority since famillies with several children will think twice about the expenditure.
(They're probably happy enough that they managed to save money to realise a trip to Kruger in the first place...)
Then there are the adults who got the means of paying, but might be too ignorant and think they know it all anyway. Then there are those
hardcore bushlovers who really know it all anyway. And who's left? A small group of visitors who would probably make use of such a facitilit
but I don't see them making up for the expenses SP will have with their activities, let alone raise a surplus.
But it all boils down to the fact that Kruger is becoming more and more like a zoo and a Disneyland in one. And looking at the reasons
given on the other side, I start wondering what happens to all the income of Kruger if conservation fees and income from accommodation
and all sort of existing activities can't fill the void. - I know the anti-poaching costs a lot of money, but there is a lot of support from commercial
enterprises as well as the average person in form of donations, that I wouldn't buy that argument if it was voiced... I also know that just a few
parks have to create enough income to support all others, but it was specifically said that Kruger has to create 85% of its operation cost and I
would like to think that that is happening?
,...I would not be surprised if the hotel fraternity all get
And all the anti-poaching organisations collecting money? Some of it must surely have arrived at Sanparks.
