Umbabaat/Ingwelala controversial lion hunt

Information and Discussions on Hunting
Post Reply
okie
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:58 pm
Country: Not here
Contact:

Umbabaat/Ingwelala controversial lion hunt

Post by okie »

From Daily Maverick :

Daily Maverick today : http://www.msn.com/en-za/news/national/ ... &ocid=iehp


Outrage after Kruger lion baited and shot by trophy hunter in neighbouring reserve


Don Pinnock


2018-06-11-outrage-after-kruger-lion-baited-and-shot-by-trophy-hunter-in-neighbouring-reserve© Provided by Daily Maverick 2018-06-11-outrage-after-kruger-lion-baited-and-shot-by-trophy-hunter-in-neighbouring-reserve
An American is believed to have paid R1-million to bring down a Kruger Park lion from a pride beloved of tourists.

On Friday a male lion was shot by a trophy hunter in Umbabat Private Nature Reserve on the boundary of Kruger National Park. Unconfirmed reports suggest it may have been the leader of the Western Pride named Skye, beloved of many tourists. If so, his cubs will be killed by another male taking over the pride.


It is probable the lion was lured out of Kruger Park with bait provided by an elephant and buffalo hunt, which took place beforehand. The hunter, whose name has not been established but is believed to be American, is estimated to have paid over R1-million to pull the trigger. Everyone involved in the hunt appears to have gone to ground, all calls going to voicemail.

The hunt raises many questions about the protection of wildlife in Umbabat and the Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR), of which it is a member. The biggest question is why the APNR reserves, on the unfenced western boundary of Kruger, are permitted to hunt animals from one of Africa’s premier, state-owned game reserves.

Image
APNR hunt map


Shortly before the hunt took place two NGOs, the EMS Foundation and Ban Animal Trading, sent a Cease and Desist warning to the APNR chairman, Rob Garmany, CEO of Kruger Park Glen Philips and The Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, threatening legal action if the hunt took place. Following the hunt they will now be considering their legal options.

Considerable hunting takes place in the APNR each year, sanctioned by the Kruger National Park and Provincial Authorities, though few tourists who visit its high-priced lodges know this.


The combined permitted APNR quota for 2018 for Timbavati, Klaserie, Umbabat and Balule was 4,467 wild animals. This included 52 elephants plus a bull older than 50 in Umbabat which could potentially be a 100-pound tusker, which many argue should never be hunted. It also listed 36 buffalo (despite a 68% drop in numbers to 2,327 in 2017), 44 kudu, 19 warthogs, seven hippo, a lion, a leopard, eight hyena, five giraffe and 4,171 impala.

A lion was expressly excluded by Kruger, but permission to hunt one was given anyway by the licensing authority, Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency. How Kruger’s sanction was circumvented needs investigation.

Image
APNR reserves advertised for hunting – Umbabat is blue.

Shortly before the hunt, the Board of Directors of Ingwelala, a share block within Umbabat that does not allow any hunting on its four properties, tried to ensure at a meeting with the Umbabat warden, Bryan Havemann, that the dominant male lion of the Western Pride would not be hunted. Havemann indicated his willingness to ensure it was not the lion named Skye.

There is ongoing tension in the APNR between lodges that rely on tourists who want to experience live animals and hunting properties and hunters who want to kill them.

Shortly after the hunt, Phil Biden of Thornybush Reserve emailed Rob Garmany, chairman of APNR, saying Thornybush “would be asking his Exco to consider if we are happy for the APNR to continue to have a hunting protocol when the hunting reserves do their own thing in any event. It may be better for the individual reserves to have their own protocol so that innocent parties are not caught up in issues like this”.

Perhaps more than any of the other reserves within the APNR, there are extreme tensions between hunting and anti-hunting owners in Umbabat, particularly over the hunting of predator species.

The lack of auditing and clear abrogation of responsibility was underlined in the hunting permissions letter from Kruger Park:

“[We] cannot comment on the revenue income or expenditure reports received from Umbabat, since it is not clear from the report how the entities within Umbabat as federal system manage and monitor income generated as result of the animal off-takes.

“It is also not clear towards which conservation, management and socio-economic activities the revenue generated is being directed. It is the mandate of MTPA as issuing authority to verify that management takes place.”

Kruger enumerated a number of other flaws, some so serious that it would have been reasonable to expect the application to be rejected.

Umbabat has been in the news previously for controversial hunting practices when a well-known coalition male lion was shot. That hunt was apparently on the property of the Luttig Trust.

Speaking for the EMS Foundation and Ban Animal Trading, Michele Pickover said Kruger Park and the animals it is tasked to protect “are of enormous consequence to humanity and as such are held in trust on our behalf. They are a national heritage asset.


“If cultural heritage, for example, was handled in the same way, it would mean that national heritage institutions would be able to sell off items such as the records of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the Taung skull or Sol Plaatje’s diary to rich capitalists and private collectors to do with what they want. In principle, there is no difference. South Africans must stand up and say ‘enough is enough!’ and fight in the animals’ corner and for our national heritage.” DM


Enough is enough
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75969
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Kruger lion hunted for trophy

Post by Richprins »

The dropping of the fences between Kruger and the private reserves was hotly debated in the 1980's, with the con being that Kruger animals would be hunted, and the pro being that it would benefit conservation land expansion immensely. The pro won.

In this case it seems the only illegality may be the issuing of the lion license against the wishes of Kruger? -O-


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 44150
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Kruger lion hunted for trophy

Post by Flutterby »

Surely it would also be illegal to bait the lion? :evil: :evil:

And what about that big tusker?? 0*\ 0*\


User avatar
RogerFraser
Site Admin
Posts: 6003
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:36 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Durban
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by RogerFraser »

I was always under the impression that for a reserver to be allowed to drop its fence to Kruger they had to agree to stop hunting as part of the conditions but it appears not to be the case :-? -O-


User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67396
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by Lisbeth »

It is supposed to be the case, but one of Sanparks weaknesses is not controlling. It has happened with rhinos being sold to hunting lodges too. They only seem to wake up when these cases end up in the media :evil:


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75969
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by Richprins »

RogerFraser wrote: Mon Jun 11, 2018 4:01 pm I was always under the impression that for a reserver to be allowed to drop its fence to Kruger they had to agree to stop hunting as part of the conditions but it appears not to be the case :-? -O-
I think it varies a lot, Rog. Fences have been dropped all around Kruger, from SA private land to provincial reserves to Mozambican coutadas and private land. The private conglomerates like Sabie-Sands and Timbavati also have a myriad of sub-owners inside them, some of whom are game farmers with fences still around their properties, some who hunt, some who only use their farms for private holidays etc.


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Dzombo
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by Dzombo »

I see on"the other side" they have posted a statement by SANP which effectively washes their hands of the incident. And the thread has been closed. Not unexpectedly.


okie
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:58 pm
Country: Not here
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by okie »

Dzombo wrote: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:27 pm I see on"the other side" they have posted a statement by SANP which effectively washes their hands of the incident. And the thread has been closed. Not unexpectedly.
Hmmmm..... if nobody hears a tree falling in the forest , does it still make a sound -O- -O- .............. 0- 0- 0- 0-


Enough is enough
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75969
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by Richprins »

Oh dear... 0-


Anyway, another complicated bit is that legally once a "wild animal" moves from government to private land it becomes the prerogative of the private owner. However, rare/protected species still fall under legislation pertaining to their "use". Furthermore, obviously should an animal pose a danger, the private landowner could exercise discretion to protect himself. Generally, though, citizens are required to contact the nearest conservation agency to deal with "escaped" animals.

Complex!


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 44150
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Hunting

Post by Flutterby »

When we visited Grietjie I asked one of the residents about hunting. They have lived there for about 20 years and he said that hunting used to be allowed in Grietjie. Then, with the increase of people living there it became a safety concern, and they decided to ban hunting. So, it seems that is up to the reserve and not SANParks.


Post Reply

Return to “Hunting”